Authorship question: The Case for Mr. Shakespeare
• February 21, 2011 • 3 CommentsPosted in Shakespeare, Shakespeare authorship debate
Tags: 1605, alderman, anne hathaway, anti-stratfordian, as you like it, ateism, baconian, ben elton, calvin hoffman, christopher marlowe, cipher system, ciphers, codes, comedy of errors, delia bacon, deptford, doctor faustus, earl of oxford, earl of southampton, edward de vere, Elizabethan, francis bacon, francis meres, greewich, groatsworth of wit, gunpowder plot, henry iv, henry v, henry vi, heresy, ignatius donnelly, james i, john manningham, john shakespeare, king john, lost years, love's labour won, macbeth, marlovian theory, oxfordian, palladis tamia, quarto, richard burbage, robert greene, romeo and juliet, second best bed, shakespeare, shakespeare authorship, shakespeare authorship debate, shakespeare identified, stratford, stratford-on-avon, tamburlaine the great, the great cryptogram, the lord chamberlain's men, the massacre at paris, the merry wives of windsor, the murder of the man who was shakespeare, the promos, the sonnets, titus andronicus, two gentlemen of verona, upstart crow, venus and adonis, william shakespeare
what you’re saying